Category Archives: Road traffic offences

The most common road traffic offences

Criminal lawyers Glasgow and Criminal lawyers Inverness see many things in the office, and one of the major things needing to be dealt with is based see injury or damage caused by road traffic offences. Many of us may even commit these offences without even realising it, and with this being true it can be useful to take the time to think about the kinds of offenses that are the most common – and we have put together a list for you.


Perhaps unsurprisingly, right at the top of the most common traffic offences is speeding. Many motorists admit that they have been guilty of speeding at least once in the past, with half admitting to speeding on the motorway. While many may not think that speeding is an issue, around a quarter of all deaths on the road are caused by speeding, meaning that choosing to travel a few miles per hour over the limit could be much more dangerous than you might have thought.


Although most people know how dangerous drink-driving can actually be, it is still a fact that more than 100,000 people in the UK alone fail a roadside breathalyser test each year. In addition to this, there are more than 3,000 incidents that are thought to be directly caused by drink-driving. It is always important to understand the limits when it comes to having a drink when you are going to take the wheel later in the day, because the risks, and the penalties, are severe. If you are found guilty of driving while under the influence of alcohol, you could be fined, banned from driving, or even given a prison sentence depending on the severity of your offence.

Using your phone while driving

Although almost everybody knows the risks of doing so, many people still choose to use their mobile phones while behind the wheel of a vehicle. More than half a million drivers are caught doing exactly this each year, however stricter penalties that have been put in place recently are expected to improve these numbers greatly.

Failing to put correct insurance in place

Thanks to the fact that it can end up costing so much money, this is one of the offences that is thought to be the most severe of all. This is shown in the penalties that you can receive if you are found guilty, which include 8 points, a £5,000 fine, or even a disqualification from driving for a certain amount of time. Research has shown that cost is a key reason to fail to organise insurance, with many drivers knowing that any fine they may have to pay if they are discovered would be less than the premium being quoted by their potential insurers.

Failing to stop after an accident

If you are in any kind of accident on the road, no matter how small, you have a legal duty to stop and exchange insurance details – or wait for the police to attend if there have been injuries. Despite this, many drivers choose not to wait, and this could incur 10 points and a £2,500 fine – or worse if the accident resulted in severe injury or death.

The majority of motoring offences can be avoided by using simple common sense. When you think about how quickly things can change when you are on the road, it is important to abide by all laws and guidelines, as this gives you the best possible chance of completing a safe journey. If you’re not sure about exactly what all of the laws of the road are, it may be a great idea to obtain an up to date copy of the highway code, to give you all of the information that you need.

Why you should hire a motoring lawyer if you have been caught speeding

Speeding is the most common driving offence in England and Wales, with more than 159,000 drivers being caught driving over the speed limit in 2015. The penalties range from a £100 fine and three points on the driver’s licence to a £2,500 fine and a lengthy ban. There’s also the option to attend a speed awareness course – at the driver’s own expense.

The UK’s speed limits

In built-up areas the speed limit is 30mph but more and more urban areas impose a 20mph speed limit. On single carriageways the limit is 60mph and on dual carriageways and motorways it’s 70mph unless there’s a clear sign saying otherwise.

There’s the right to challenge the allegation, of course, but this usually means hiring a strong legal team like to navigate the subtleties of UK law.

Why you should use a lawyer

It is never advisable to attend Court unrepresented. Human nature dictates that corners are often cut when it comes to evidence and procedure and without an expert in this often complicated area of law, you will lose the chance to use it to your advantage. There is a much greater risk of the Court misapplying the law when it comes to unrepresented defendants, so that you are wrongfully convicted or receive a harsher sentence than you would have done if you had a solicitor. You need expert knowledge and experience and that comes from a genuine specialist.

Those three points may seem relatively harmless at first glance but if you reach 12 you will be facing the possibility of a 6 month ban which could have a catastrophic effect on your livelihood and family. If you need a clean driving licence for your job you’ll be very worried, and if you face losing your licence, it could mean unemployment. Bringing a legal team on board to argue in court for you will almost certainly help you.

If you believe you’re being wrongly accused

If you plan to contest your speeding charge you can’t do it by yourself as you simply won’t have the training or knowledge. It can be a scary process, taking on the prosecution, which is why you shouldn’t do it alone. With lawyers, you’ll have someone confident, knowledgeable and experienced in your corner.

If you were speeding

If you’re planning to plead guilty and there’s enough evidence against you to secure a conviction, you still have options that can reduce the penalties or the ban. Lessening the severity of the punishment can help you to retain your job and keep your family financially supported.

You could have your case dismissed altogether

If your legal team can spot a flaw in the prosecution case then they can get your case dismissed. The police may not have followed procedures properly, or the speed camera could have been wrong (it has been known). If it’s your job and your family security on the line, why wouldn’t you give it a shot?

Drink driving and exceptional hardship

drunk driving

Most of us have preconceptions about drink driving. Perhaps you envision someone drinking heavily each evening after work and then driving home. A claim of exceptional hardship might then be thought of as a way for those who frequently drink and drive to avoid the repercussions of their routine behaviour. The facts are much more complicated than that. While an experienced solicitor might help avoid a drink driving ban due to exceptional hardship, it may not be for the reasons you would expect.

Morning after drink driving

As you might imagine, drink driving arrests are most frequent in the evening, however, in 2011 more people failed breath tests between 6 am and 11 am than in the hour before and after midnight. This is largely attributed to people still being over the legal limit for alcohol they consumed the night before. Commuters being arrested for drink driving on their way to work in the morning is quite different from our perception of how drink driving normally occurs.

Since 1970 drink driving fatalities have decreased 83 percent in the UK. This is due to improved vehicle safety, tougher drink driving regulations, and better public awareness of the dangers of drink driving. In spite of these efforts, a report by the UK’s THINK! campaign found that 33 percent of the drivers surveyed were unaware that four or more servings of alcohol consumed at night could still cause them to be legally drunk the following morning. In a different study, 46 percent of drivers were unaware of how long alcohol remained in the bloodstream.

This means more public education is necessary to alert drivers to the perils of morning after drinking. In the meantime, this ignorance leads many morning commuters to face life-altering legal repercussions for what could be a one-time lapse in judgement.

The truth about exceptional hardship

Periodically rulings based on a claim of exceptional hardship make the news. The Telegraph published an article back in 2010 stating that ten thousand people had avoided driving bans that year, in spite of having 12 or more points. The newspaper reported that approximately one in four drivers facing disqualification had been shown clemency by the courts due to exceptional hardship. This prompted some advocates to express concerns about how many people with 12 or more points were able to avoid the driving ban.

The Sentencing Council mandates a tolling up disqualification if a driver reaches 12 points, however, it provides the courts with the ability and the obligation to make a ruling based on the circumstances involved in each specific case. In addition, although a 6-month disqualification is the recommended minimum, the courts are able to adjust the driving ban based on the driver’s history and any mitigating factors. This is an important provision of the law as under the points system a driver might reach the 12-point disqualification level after one speeding ticket and a single drink driving arrest. Another driver might reach the same 12-points whist clearly displaying a high likelihood of recidivism. The courts have the ability to provide for a longer ban if circumstances warrant it while recognising any exceptional hardships a ban might create.

The legal standard is that routine hardship is not sufficient to justify reducing or avoiding a driving ban. Only hardship that is exceptional is considered although other personal circumstances may be a factor in a determination of disqualification. Under the law, a driver who has previously avoided a driving ban due to exceptional circumstances cannot use those same exceptional circumstances in the following three years to fight another pending disqualification, so helping to prevent drivers from repeating driving offences and continuing to avoid penalties. In this way, the exceptional hardship provision protects drivers from being unduly penalised for what might be a single offense while protecting society from repeat offenders.

Recent celebrity cases have brought greater public attention to the concept of exceptional hardship. Where former Manchester United footballer, Ray Wilkins, was awarded a four-year driving ban – Wilkins had a history of drink driving and was arrested after he was found driving erratically and consuming alcohol as he drove –  footballer Joe Cole was able to avoid a one since it was found this would cause his wife exceptional hardship. She was no longer able to drive after being traumatised by a carjacking so she relied on her husband’s ability to do so. In the past, courts have also ruled that exceptional hardship can include the ability to care for one’s extended family or to protect from damage to a business.

However, protecting one’s own job is not considered an adequate reason in itself for waiving a driving ban. For example, a Bradford motorbike instructor’s 4-year driving ban for drink driving was upheld because the judge viewed that the instructor would have been fully aware of the potential consequences of his actions and had foreknowledge that his livelihood would be threatened if he were to commit the offence.

In the UK, the number of drink driving fatalities has stayed fairly consistent since 2010. This prompted Scotland to lower their drink driving limit from 50mg per 100ml of blood in December 2014. In June 2016, legislation to lower the drink driving limit from 80ml to 50ml throughout the rest of the UK was passed by the House of Lords before running out of parliamentary time. The issue is likely to be revisited since a recent study showed 77 percent of UK residents support stricter drink driving regulations. Legislative changes are likely to create new challenges in the future for drink driving solicitors.

Image cc by Ben Salter on Flickr.